From Voice ~ Topics: advertising, strategy
Customizing Graffiti
The murals had been commissioned by an ad agency for the car company. Global Hue (fig. 2), the Chrysler Group's “multicultural” agency based in Michigan, hired street artists to paint grafitti like versions of the vehicle in various cities.
The person on the street seeing such murals was, of course, likely to get the impression that the street artists chose the subject themselves, lending street cred to the car. Two or three of the murals, which are fading away or being painted over, were painted in Atlanta (Fig. 3), Houston (Fig. 4), Chicago (Fig. 5), New York (Fig. 6), and Los Angeles (Fig. 7). The Manhattan murals were painted by Tats Cru, an outfit that has cleverly combined painting memorial murals for inner-city victims of violence with other ads for the likes of Coca Cola.
The murals may not be authentic street art, but they are at least more authentic than the recent Chrysler print advertising that depicts the Chrysler 300C in company of scantily clad female models (Fig. 9). These are accompanied by African American men dressed in the double breasted suits and Bosalino hats favored in the 1970s by Walt “Clyde” Frazier of the New York Knicks—a look that frankly can only be called the “pimp”. “Respect” reads the ad copy. From Ford's earlier wild posting of illegal posters to gain street cred, car makers have moved to more imaginative promotional efforts that try not to look like advertising. Scion, Toyota's youth brand, hired “urban” artists to customize scale models and panels of Scion automobiles and shipped a show of art and the cars themselves to galleries around the country. These included the well known grafitti artist Futura and Mister Cartoon, tattooist to Eminem and other stars.
Last year, Nissan set up several “event” sculptures, surrealist “vignettes,” including a sculpture of a “hot” Maxima, ostensibly searing walls and melting parking meters. In 2003, Nissan ran an ad campaign including street posters showing its Altima model covered with what appeared to be graffiti coming from a group that listed its website. But ElectricMoyo.com turned out to have been created by Nissan itself, despite a note expressing thanks to the company: “much respect to Nissan for allowing us to use their billboards.”
There's that word again—respect, which does not seem to be directed at the intelligence of the consumer. Much of the street graphics the car companies offer is about as authentic as the wood grain on their dashboards—and it fades as quickly as the old fake wood station wagons of the 1970s. The SoHo mural is already gone.
-
This is not a new trend. Advertising has insinuated itself into our lives for the entire century. BUT I wonder what would happen if for ONE month out of every year there would be NO advertising. Not one piece of it on TV, billboards, bananas, etc.? Would the economy come to a sudden halt?
-
the funny thing is that graffiti, in its traditional sense, was something created in opposition to 'corporate rule.' it was created in the slums, it was a way of saying 'we can advertise just like you fat cats!'(not only that though) and now, it's everywhere! it's no surprise to me that these same fat cats would commision something so small, yet powerful, as graffiti! i'm laughing and crying about how these graff artists lost sight of just how much power we have with the 12oz inside our hands; and without money! but, then again, that's progress! right?
notice i wrote artists, and not writers(there is a difference). -
need facts and background-informations about 300 years of graffiti-research,you find them here
in case of interest?
archive1@aol.com -
If anyone watched the apprentice last night they had to come up with two graffiti ads for playstation. The show was a bit entertaining since you have a bunch of brats trying to feed of the urban society. I especially loved the way Trump said "I hate Graffiti".
I hope that this will start a new era of advertisement that can break the high class corporation in some way. Or it may just be a trend that will fade away? Who knows? -
It is just another poor excuse to bring the underground to the mainstream. I am sure the artists are happy with the compensation. But why prostitute something that is more real to its environment than anything any of these car companies are producing?
And it is not just the car companies. For years, a particular graffiti writer has gained notoriety for altering big budget ad posters around the world. Now, Ralph Lauren and others have hired the writer to intentionally alter ads and release them as if he changed them in his normal fashion. That seems so wrong to me. I hope this trend dies very soon. -
This is from a non-american view point:
This thought occured to me over the last week:
Some people find American branding a form of vandalism. For example, Starbucks, GAP and MacDonalds are often vilified for defacing the local character of urban centers outside the USA.
Graffiti, and in paricular wild style writing, which probably accounts for 99 percent of all graffiti in the West, also originates from America. and also defaces the local character of cities and towns.
Graffiti is a dialect of American capitalism. -
Clarification: It sounds like KAWS is the artist that 'silent threat' is talking about in his/her post. If this is the case (and I apologize if it isn't), then the allegations that he has done commissioned posters in his signature street style for companies are false. This is a common misconception, but the artist has noted again in recent interviews that he has never accepted such proposals (although some have been sent his way).
-
I like the idea of no advertisements for one month, I don't listen to the radio because I hate ads and I mute or channel surf during ads on TV.
-
Okay, I grew up on punk rock. And initially, I was nonplussed when I heard the Buzzcocks in an ad for the Toyota RAV 4. I didn't know quite what to make of it. I mentioned it to Joe Strummer during an interview and he said something to the effect of "Good for them! They deserve it. They've been in the van for years. They're in the van right now, as we speak!" Then I heard the Smiths in a Nissan ad (Maxima). Then the Ramones in another Nissan ad (Pathfinder). Then the STOOGES in a Nissan ad (XTerra). When a Japanese/French company puts Detroit's greatest rock 'n' roll band in an ad, you know the Big 3 are in trouble.
Okay, so this is an *aside* from the real argument, but it's very pertinent to the case. The original punks, by and large, were either frustrated artists themselves or hung out with plenty of avant-garde artists (Andy Warhol, Jamie Reid, Arturo Vega, etc.) And they were *smart*. It's only once you get into the second wave of British punk and the second wave of American hardcore that the lunkheads got involved in any meaningful way.
Hip-hop, on the other hand tends to be (note that this is a sweeping generalization with many notable exceptions) built around who can come up with the trickest beats, the biggest smackdowns, the hardest braggadocio, etc. To my mind, modern urban culture is by-and-large, bankrupt. As a kid, I loved hip-hop. As a teenager I was struck by the power of groups like Public Enemy and Spearhead. But now it's all come down to bling. DCX partnered with DUB magazine -- the most fawning glorification I've seen of bad cars and idiotic people I've ever seen -- to release DUB editions of their LX-platform cars (The Snoop-approved 300, the Dodge Magnum and the new Charger). Which means that urban culture has pretty much (to use an already-clichéd phrase) jumped the shark.
But who cares? The Clash were selling Jaguars, now they're selling Pontiacs. Scion's campaign sucks. Their radio spots of a year ago reeked of inauthenticity. They don't quite get it. They're selling quite a few cars, but they're also not accomplishing the goal they set out for, which was to sell to young people. Same with Honda's Element. They're solid, affordable cars, but they're not as affordable as a used Civic.
The Chrysler 300 was a hit with the urban community before it was ever marketed toward them. Why? Because it's a great car. It looks fresh and classical at the same time and it's powered by a honking V-8.
I'm not gonna buy a G6 just because my hero Joe Strummer played guitar in its commercial, just like if I were a kid from the ghetto, I wouldn't buy a Magnum because of some graf professionally sprayed on a wall. And if I were a rave-type kid, I wouldn't buy a Scion just because of some crappy techno music and available neon interior lighting. Okay, maybe I would, because most of the club kids I know are truly pathetic wastes of space.
My point here is somewhat nebulous, but in an age where kids think TyPiNg LiKe ThIs and spelling incorrectly is cool, the marketing people are obviously struggling to relate. More than anything, these ads prove the cluelessness of corporate America and their inability to get into the heads of the younger set. -
I used to like the 300 - a lot. Now it's been firmly adopted by the ghetto/gangster crowd... complete with pimped-out aftermarket grills, lots of gold trim, and suspension-destroying low profile tires. Once more, Chrysler is now pointedly marketing this vehicle toward the urban gang lifestyle.
So no thanks, the 300's stigma is not the identity I'm looking to wear.
And for the record, I'd be a much more likely to pay attention to the use of music from The Smiths or even New Order more often in commercials. It certainly identifies a lot more with my life than LudaKris ever would. -
"the Man": The Forbidden Fruit of Street Art
It's good to be bad. Well, at least it's good for the economy. Street artists have been breaking laws since creation, and honestly I can't believe that it took large corporations so long to catch on. Ever since brands evolved, companies have been trying to find new and clever ways to reach the consumer audience to make an extra buck.
While one has to suppose that guerrilla marketing has no limits, it's disappointing to me that the "all rebellious" street artists could care less and gave into the temptations of the man. The forbidden fruit, in the bible of street art. Unfortunately, I think it says a lot about my generation today. In the past it seemed as though when people were involved in something, they actually cared. I feel like inflation of consumerist culture through branding and product identity has caused people to lost sight of what they really believe in. I'm not saying that people never cared about outward appearances in the past, it just seems that in today's society, so many of those decisions are made for us before we've gotten the opportunity to chose. -
I DONT CARE WHAT NOBODY SAY . GRAFFITI IS IN AND WILL ALWAYS BE IN STYLE. IM GLAD GRAFFITI IS USED IN A HELPFUL WAY INSTEAD OF JUST WRITING ON EVERY BUILDING THEY SEE. QUITTING HATING AND JUST BE HAPPY FOR PEOPLE WHO ARE DOING GOOD IN THE COMMUNITY, AND FOR THE RECORD I WOULD PAY MORE ATTENTION TWO LUDARCRIS MUSIC THAN I WOULD THE SMITHS OR NEW ORDER.
-
Why don't you offer your house and property to any and all graffiti vandals so you can enjoy the works of art every day. Graffiti = failed parenting and lack of morals and ethics. Look a little deeper into the issue rather than your superficial evaluation of the situation.
-
I don't know who's doing the most "Pimping". Chrysler or the audience Chrysler hopes to reach. I'm appalled that an art form with such rich history and meaning is being used to sell some cars. Just like every other trend, the mainstream use of Graffiti will fade and Graff artists will keep doing what they've been doing for years. Because it's not about the money...right?
-
Pace. Graffiti is not new-- nor is its purpose. It appears on the walls at Pompeii -- *advertising* an entrepreneurial duo of a scribe and a stone-cutter, among other more indelicate writings. Graffitti,in early-alphabetic writing from the 18th-century BCE, appears on the walls at Wadi El-Hol. What is new is the sheer size of modern literate and semi-literate populations.
-
I think there is a lot of sense in "modern urban culture is by-and-large, bankrupt" by Davey G. Johnson. But is it really bankrupt, or it just seems so to us when we are witnessing how it is exploited by corporate world. In this perspective we are probably the first generation affected by corporate use of culture on massive scale.
-
I like that big companies would use graffiti for their advertising. I think it gives credit to that type of art as well as speaking to a different group of consumers that ordinarily might not be interested in their product.
-
To be honest, i really don't see a problem with ordinary graffiti anyway, i mean sure if it was on someones house, or just a scrawl on a wall then i'd think it's pathetic. But some of these are amazing pieces of art here, i sure wish i had that talent!
-
i agree just a thought, cool name btw :)

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Comments