From Voice ~ Topics: networking, professional development
Tastings
Washor said it was, and he knew why. "I got two ideas and two contacts," he said. "That's as much as I have any right to expect."
Those criteria seem to me to be as good as any for assessing the value of conferences. After years of brooding about what design conferees have a right to expect, and wondering how often those expectations are met, I long ago decided not to attend any conferences I was not required to take part in. Still, I seemed to be going to too many. Well, there were too many. Yet I continued to go, finding myself in the position of the client who knows half of the money he spends on advertising is wasted, but does not know which half.
Recently, however, I attended a conference that I was not recruited, or even especially encouraged, to attend. It was sold out. But when I explained that I was not threatening to come for the entire day as a paying customer, but merely wanted to sit in on one particular breakout session that two friends of mine were running, I was cleared to crash.
The event was an AIGA New York student conference devoted to the question, "Are You a Designer?" Small wonder that it was sold out. The roster of presenters was loaded with design luminaries, and the thematic question is one raised chronically by students and perhaps not entirely put aside by many practitioners. Arriving a few minutes early, I was lucky enough to catch the tail end of Carin Goldberg's presentation, which closed with an onscreen quote from Anthelme Brillat- Savarin's The Physiology of Taste: "Tell me what you eat, and I will tell you what you are." That didn't meet either of Washor's criteria-the epigram was not a new idea to me and Carin was not a new contact, but the episode gave me an excuse to revisit a story I wish I'd told 20 years ago.
It was AIGA's first national AIGA conference, held in Boston in 1985, recorded in both local and AIGA lore as "the year of that hurricane." As the winds grew fiercer and the sky darker, conferees were instructed to leave the MIT auditorium where we had been meeting, and take refuge in the nearest hotel. Once we got there, everyone was admonished to sit tight. There wasn't much else to do—all flights were cancelled—but sitting tight was no small task for some 1,200 people expecting to see visual presentations. Some resourceful person quickly rounded up a dozen or more speakers and fellow travelers, of whom I was one, to serve as an ad hoc panel to discuss—well, the subject was left open, and stayed that way. Our role was like that of the orchestra on the Titanic: to make things look normal as long as possible.
Someone was saddled with the chore of acting as moderator. In the absence of anything to moderate he invited the audience to ask the panel a question, and immediately got one.
"What is your favorite food?"
I like too many comestibles to have a favorite, but this was no occasion for a technical objection. The mission was entertainment, not truth. I don't remember my answer, only that it was lame. Some panelists were more amusing than others, but the only one who stood out was the writer Tom Wolfe. Earlier that day he had delivered a hilarious talk lampooning the preposterous extravagance of the corporate literature produced by AIGA members and their ilk. Continuing in that vein, he now revealed his favorite food: "The Fairchild annual report!"
On the way to the airport the next day I realized what I should have said. It would not have answered the question, but panelists rarely do that anyway, nor do questioners usually expect them to. No, I would have used the query as an occasion to recount two adventures built around the favorite foods of other people. Both of them tended to repudiate Brillat-Savarin's famous dictum. At a performance of Ballet Theatre one night I read in the program book that George Ballantine's favorite sandwich consisted of caviar and cream cheese spread on an untoasted English muffin. Inspired, I stopped at Zabar's on the way back from Lincoln Center and eagerly bought all three ingredients. When I got home, I made the sandwich. It was delicious. I made another. It was also good but uncomfortably filling. That night I got painfully sick to my stomach and swore off caviar and modern ballet, which I couldn't afford after buying the caviar in the first place.
The other adventure also began in print. In one of the magazines found only in dentist's waiting rooms I had read that Richard Nixon's favorite lunch was cottage cheese and ketchup, which I judged appropriately revolting. One day, weeks later, I was working at home on a tight deadline and didn't want to stop for lunch. In the refrigerator I found the makings of a Nixonian feast. Making certain that I was not being watched, I spread the ingredients on a plate and sat down to the meal with trepidation.
It was not half bad. In fact, it was pretty good. If pressed, I will admit that I have tried the combination again since then with no regrets. As Milton Glaser says after describing his mother's famously infamous spaghetti recipe, "Don't knock it until you try it."
The same principle was pointedly emphasized at yet another AIGA conference by then I.D. editor Chee Pearlman, who presented Dr. Seuss's classic children's book Green Eggs and Ham as a metaphorical injunction to clients: Do not form an opinion about any design without tasting it first.
-
Its true sometimes the things you think are gross, or stupid or even lame. When you actually get the courage to try it, sometimes you end up really enjoying it. Thanks for the great read.
-
I enjoyed the correlation between food and design in this article. The comparison may seem unrelated, to some, but it really does make perfect sense. Everyone has a different design sense, just as everyone prefers different food. The majority of designers stick to something safe and well known, and those that break the norm and experiment are the ones that really grab our attention and curiosity. I feel that those who have unique preferences and tastes, in food or other, are the ones who are the most interesting. The designs that interest, provoke, and even anger, are the ones that wind up to be the most successful. All you have to do is try it, you may be pleasantly surprised. Playing it safe in the design world will attract limited attention, just as if your favorite food was pizza, but by taking that chance and stretching your limits it will capture the imagination and interest of others, just as the caviar and cream cheese on an untoasted english muffin did.
-
I think this presents a very interesting argument for so called undesired realms in both the food as well as the design world. Just because something on the outside does not seem normal, or possibly even a turn off, it doesn't take away from its effectiveness. Wether it is an unappealing combination of food, or taste for design, it's function serves a purpose, and to the correct audience makes all the difference. In the design world, something doesn't have to appeal to everyone, only the people that it is targeted to. Speaking personally, i am turned off by certain styles or ideas in design, but sometimes you have to realize that it may not be for you personally. What is ineffective to me, or not tasteful design, does not mean that it is not fufilling its purpose. In perspective to this article the argument and correlation between food and design makes an extremely valid point. And excuse my cliche review when i say that this presents some "food for thought."
-
As I began to read the article I found myself a little lost, searching for a connection between each story before I understood the concept behind the article. But I did not stop reading, I was so interested in the individual stories; it was present day, than it was 1985, than food became the main subject of the article. That’s when I began to grasp the concept, a beautiful metaphor made between food and design. Not only does it relate back to Brillat-Savarin’s quote “Tell me what you eat, and I will tell you what you are,” at the beginning of the article, it exemplifies the final metaphorical injunction: Do not form an opinion about any design without tasting it first.
As I look deeper into the meaning behind the title “Tastings,” I find that the style of the article is written as such. As a reader, I am given a “taste” of each story. Each taste leads me closer and closer to the whole, the final concept of the article. In essence, “Tastings” allows the reader to experience the metaphor as they read the article. The reader cannot form any opinions about the article while reading it because the concept of the article isn’t solidified until the last sentence of the article.
Beautiful. -
I think as designers, it's really important to not be so close-minded in terms of style and approach. Design is a fluid, impressionable, and ever-changing medium which requires poeple willing to be daring and try something new for the sake of experiment and exploration. On many occasions I have found inspiration in the most unexpected of places. I have also come to believe that as a designer, you must first step outside of the box before you can think outside of it. Much like tasting food which is different and strange, designers must also push themsleves to think and approach probblems differently, or no progress will be made, and design will become stagnant.
ps. my favorite food is lasagna :) -
The connection with design and food is very intriguing because I think that food is really a reflection of yourself, your culture and your environment as with design. You love what you have been expose to and for the most part you don’t know what you are missing until you try new things. Some people are hesitant to go in the realm of the unknown and some people love trying new things. I think you can acquire taste for anything just as long as you open your mind to it and you are willing to. There are the classics but also the new quirky combinations that don’t seem quite right at first but it turns out to be absolutely amazing. Everyone has their own taste and it may not appeal to all but it’s that unusual combination that got you to stop and pay attention in the first place!
I was born in Boston in 1985! My favorite food is my mom’s authentic Cambodian hot pot. Nothing beats mama’s home cooked meals. -
Very nice article! I think that life is made to try things. Some time it may not seem good, but most of the time we end up enjoying it, especially for food! I remember how sushi didn't look good, now i can't skip a week :P

Comments